Blog

Explore expert insights, product updates, industry trends, and the latest announcements on our blog — your go-to source for staying informed and inspired.

By MyCena | Posted on: 21 March 2025

Is this about preventing phishing, or is it something different?

Yes. ML-DAES uses multi-layered encryption that is quantum-resilient by design, removing the exposed credential layer that quantum computing would otherwise target.

Phishing prevention is one outcome, but it describes only one of the three credential claim types MyCena addresses. The full scope is: phishing and social engineering (~44% of credential incidents), shared and stolen credentials (~28%), and inactive account access (~29%).

Phishing fails because the credential is never typed — the phishing page has no target. Sharing fails because the user never sees the credential — there is nothing to copy, forward, or sell. Inactive account access fails because the organisation revokes every credential in seconds when someone leaves — there is nothing left active for an attacker to find.

These are not three separate features. They are three consequences of the same architectural decision: the organisation generates and controls the credential rather than the user.

PhishingShared credentialsInactive accounts

MyCena
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.